Comments on: A is for Alpaca, Anorak … Agriculture? http://roverarts.com/2009/10/a-is-for-alpaca-anorak-agriculture/ Montreal Arts Uncovered Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:51:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: fred http://roverarts.com/2009/10/a-is-for-alpaca-anorak-agriculture/comment-page-1/#comment-445 fred Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:11:46 +0000 http://roverarts.com/?p=2562#comment-445 inulin is a polysaccaride starch analog, not a sugar. As a Neolithic gardener I find that American vegetables are all useable, while most of the self-important European varieties can't compete with the equally delicious European weeds, rendering themselves uncultivateable. inulin is a polysaccaride starch analog, not a sugar.

As a Neolithic gardener I find that American vegetables are all useable, while most of the self-important European varieties can’t compete with the equally delicious European weeds, rendering themselves uncultivateable.

]]> By: richardquillan http://roverarts.com/2009/10/a-is-for-alpaca-anorak-agriculture/comment-page-1/#comment-385 richardquillan Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:56:07 +0000 http://roverarts.com/?p=2562#comment-385 Nice record about the lifestyle of Americans' in the past. Your posting is very informative and useful. Thanks for sharing with us. Keep smiling.... Nice record about the lifestyle of Americans’ in the past. Your posting is very informative and useful. Thanks for sharing with us. Keep smiling….

]]> By: Addison Steele http://roverarts.com/2009/10/a-is-for-alpaca-anorak-agriculture/comment-page-1/#comment-373 Addison Steele Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:40:21 +0000 http://roverarts.com/?p=2562#comment-373 Wow! "Inulin" versus "insulin". That's quite perceptive. But is then the rest of the sentence correct? Does "inulin" perform the same task as the writer's original "insulin"? And why exactly should this be required reading for all schoolchildren? Was this written with schoolchildren in mind? And why should "bold assertions" put this on "less than solid academic ground"? Is the critic saying that "solid academic ground" has no room for "bold assertions"? I've always believed as much but never been brave enough to say as much!! Wow! “Inulin” versus “insulin”. That’s quite perceptive. But is then the rest of the sentence correct? Does “inulin” perform the same task as the writer’s original “insulin”? And why exactly should this be required reading for all schoolchildren? Was this written with schoolchildren in mind? And why should “bold assertions” put this on “less than solid academic ground”? Is the critic saying that “solid academic ground” has no room for “bold assertions”? I’ve always believed as much but never been brave enough to say as much!!

]]>