Books

Writing non-fiction’s a bitch – a truth not universally acknowledged.

Theatre

Comment

What an interestingly inviting read on this mind muddled morning. Thanks! Coffee, Please?

Strength to Cry

by B. A. Markus


“MIGHT IT TAKE STRENGTH TO CRY, TO CONSIDER ALL THAT WAS AND WILL NEVER BE?” So muses the sixteen-year-old narrator of Monique Polak’s novel, What World is Left. Anneke is an inmate in Theresienstadt, the Nazis’ so-called model concentration camp. Of the four novels released this fall by Montreal writers on the theme of Holocaust survival, Polak’s work is the only one that takes the reader to the heart of the horror by creating a character whose vivid confusion, disbelief, and innocence are immediate and powerful.

Anneke is based on Polak’s mother, Celien Spier. While Polak is careful to explain that this is not a memoir of her mother’s life per se, Spier’s history forms the book’s framework. Like Anneke, Celien Spier’s father was an established Dutch cartoonist whose artistic skills saved his wife and children from the gas chambers. Both Polak’s mother and her fictional counterpart endured the misery of camp life; in the end, remaining hopeful is what allowed them to survive.

Polak explores this reality’s effects on survivors and their families perceptively and with depth. Her book is intended for young adult readers. The three others considered here are meant for the adult market. Curiously, they all take a more arm’s-length approach, in terms of both style and subject matter.

Ann Charney’s earlier book, Dobryd featured a child narrator based on Charney’s own experiences as a five-year-old in hiding in rural Poland during WWII. In her new novel, Distantly Related to Freud, we meet eight-year-old Ellen, the narrator, who has come to Montreal with her mother after the war. Their migrations have taught them not to get too attached, to people or places.

Charney appears to have applied the same lesson to her writing style. Even when Ellen is supposedly in the throes of adolescent angst over an amorous young man, or panicked anxiety about her missing best friend Lydia, the reader never quite feels Ellen’s emotions. The plot of this coming-of-age story also feels like a series of near misses. The post-coital breakup with Peter is done by mail and Lydia reappears after a kidnapping virtually unchanged, aside from a new hairdo. Distance and denial may be useful life skills for survivors of genocide, but they are problematic as narrative choices in a novel. Perhaps the writer sensed the limitations of a narrator with an emotional half-life when in the final paragraphs Ellen realizes that, “…my old strategy – see them before they see you- no longer satisfied me…” and hastens “… inside, towards the warmth and the light…” Yet after 314 pages of being kept on the outside and no convincing proof of the character’s transformation, it is difficult for the reader to believe that Ellen’s modus operandi has really changed.

Gina Roitman’s collection of linked stories, which she openly admits read like a memoir of her experience as the daughter of Holocaust survivors, in a displaced person’s camp in Germany and then in Montreal, takes the adult reader closest to what it means to grow up in the shadow of one’s parents’ past. Roitman’s writing style is straightforward and unembellished, and although written in English somehow reads like a tale in Yiddish, infused throughout with the sights, smells, and sounds of Montreal in the fifties.

Roitman introduces her book by describing her mother’s effect on her life and her work. “She crops up in my stories — her words, her expressions… When I’m in doubt, she is still the strongest voice in my head.” No surprise then that the most powerful stories take place during Leah’s childhood. Here we glimpse what it means to be loved by a mother who survived Auschwitz and who now struggles to reconcile the pain of past losses — a husband and three-year-old son — with her desire for intimacy with her rebellious only daughter.

In What World is Left young Anneke stays hopeful, her father often repeating, “All that matters is that we are still together.” Roitman/Leah’s mother also manages to sustain hope for the future, attach to her children and learn to love Leah’s father, her second husband, even though she lost her first family. It is her Jewishness — a faith in God, the Yiddish language, and ritual practices, especially those involving food — that keeps her going. Although Leah is hurt by her mother’s criticisms and manipulations, she is also grateful for her mother’s flashes of emotional intensity. The maternal emotions — sorrow, anger, pain, and joy — educate Leah and allow Roitman to create an engaging protagonist.

Ami Sands Brodoff’s mother-in-law inspired The White Space Between. She has done her research: studied testimonies from survivors, delved extensively into her husband’s family history. Yet her depiction of survivor Jane Ives, formerly Jana Ivanova, secretary of death, doesn’t ring true. When Jane arrives unexpectedly at her daughter Willow’s apartment in Montreal, accepts an invitation from gregarious neighbor Luc and ends up spending the day in his welcoming apartment, Brodoff explains the older woman’s immediate ease with the young stranger by claiming, “Jane has become more trusting in her old age…”

Unfortunately, Holocaust survivors rarely become more trusting with age, especially those who, like Jane, recount their war memories in “[An] eerie mechanical voice…tone formal and distant…” and who, according to her daughter Willow, ” Wouldn’t let me go on class outings, field trips, even though she taught in the same school! … I couldn’t go into the next room without her shouting, ‘Be careful!’”

Brodoff’s mother-daughter protagonists do express their emotions, “…sudden rages…crying jags,” but these outbursts are described rather than experienced by the reader, and like Jane’s testimony of her wartime experience the reader’s distance from the action diminishes the emotional impact.

Jane tells her daughter, “You can survive anything, if you can tell a story about it.” But it is not simply telling a story that helps us survive painful histories. What is required are tales that touch us deeply, that affirm both our suffering and our survival, giving us in turn the strength to cry.

B. A. Markus is a writer, mother, and child of a Holocaust survivor, living in Montreal. She is currently looking for a publisher for her first novel.

Share

{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Michael Atkin 11.01.2009 at 9:38 am

For some alternative perspectives on and reactions to The White Space Between by Ami Sands Brodoff, including reader reactions, check the following links:

http://www.amazon.com/review/product/1897187491/

http://www.aelaq.org/mrb/article.php?issue=25&article=715&cat=2

http://www.buzzingblue.com/?tag=ami-sands-brodoff

Reply

2 tim Jones 11.01.2009 at 1:37 pm

man…

that`s heavy -

and too many commas, etc…

but interesting nonetheless…

Reply

3 Carla Hagen 11.01.2009 at 4:45 pm

I have read two of the four books reviewed here–Ami Sands Brodoff’s The White Space Between and Gina Roitman’s Tell Me a Story, Tell Me The Truth. I agree with the reviewer that Roitman’s linked stories read like a memoir. I felt they were complementary to Sands Brodoff’s vividly imagined novel. Although I have read neither Distantly Related to Freud nor What World is Left (the only one of the four on which the reviewer lavishes high praise), I did notice a glaring discrepancy: It appears that What World is Left is the only one of the works that actually takes place during the Holocaust. The other three, if I am not mistaken, are set in the now and the legacy of the Holocaust. If that it is true, it seems unfair and unwise to compare the four books. (Additionally, What World is Left is a YA book). If the criteria of the reviewer is immediacy of the Holocaust, then obviously What World is Left will come out on top–and I’m sure it is a fine book, which I look forward to reading. My complaint is that the other books, and especially The White Space Between, get short shrift. Can each book not be reviewed on its own merits, rather than being lumped in and summarily compared to other books, merely because they all pertain in some way–but in very different ways–to the Holocaust? I expect better from your journal.
Sincerely,
Carla Hagen

Reply

4 Leo 11.01.2009 at 5:54 pm

I, too, have only read one of the books in question, that being Brodoff’s The White Space Between.

Not only is Carla’s point an excellent one that all reviewers should take to heart when doing multiple reviews within a single piece (look to Harper’s for some guidance there; they have some excellent reviews of that type), but also, the reviewer of Brodoff’s book missed what I think is a fundamental theme of the work.

The clue is in the title itself. The tale is about the relationship between a daughter and mother that illuminates with clarity the ‘white spaces’ which exist between family members – those facts, issues and moments of private lives that people go to great lengths to keep hidden from view. These white spaces, then, provide the dramatic backdrop to the life of a mother who has lived through the Holocaust and emigrated to Montreal to start a new life, only to have to flee to the United States to find peace at last, and her daughter who has become an accomplished artist, returning to Montreal to put on her first solo show.

The perspective of a Holocaust victim, mixed with the theme of white spaces, is a unique take on relationships and on how such a traumatic event can permanently alter the perception and outlook of a human being.

Brodoff’s writing is clear and full of meaning. Her characters are grounded in the here and now and are richly defined and vivid in the reading. The descriptions of Montreal are down to earth and complimentary, showing us a human and livable city. It has a strong narrative that easily pulls the reader through. It is, in the end, a genuine love story of a city, a love story between mother and daughter, a story of the moments of life that define us all.

For that alone, Brodoff ought to be praised loudly by her fellow writers in her home town.

Reply

5 Judith 12.01.2009 at 5:14 am

I have only read Brodoff’s The White Space Between as well so I can’t comment on the review of the other books, but I do feel that the Brodoff review is a bit lopsided. I’m sure it must be very hard to review a book in just a few lines, but it seems to me that the reviewer only focused on the negative aspects.

Brodoff’s book is wonderfully written and I found the characters very enticing. If anything, I wanted the book to be longer.

Reply

6 Elaine Kalman 12.01.2009 at 3:21 pm

Reviewing books is a tricky business and an honest reviewer will call it the way she sees it. Doing so may make her enemies for life among other writers–but, over time, will earn her respect with readers. (Rooting for an author because she’s home-grown talent is cheerleading, not criticism.) That said, reading is a subjective endeavour. Monique Polak’s novel was trashed by its reviewer in The Gazette. The only way to know whether you like it or not, is to read it for yourself.

Reply

7 Mary Soderstrom 26.01.2009 at 10:57 am

I’d like to say a word for the elegance and understated seriousness of Distantly Related to Freud. Ann Charney’s book should not be grouped in the category of “haulocaust survivor” books because it transcends that category. It speaks to questions of identity that are universal, It also captures the way adults try to protect children from the past no matter what that may be, and how children must nevertheless learn to build their own lives on their heritage which they may only dimly understand.

M

Reply

8 Peter McFarllane 27.01.2009 at 9:58 pm

The minimum that we should expect from reviewers is that they review the book that the writer has actually written. The B.A. Markus review of Ann Charney’s Distantly Related to Freud missed the minimum by a wide margin. For some not easily discernable reason, the reviewer included the novel in her survey of recent Holocaust literature in the subcategory of books “on the theme of Holocaust survival.” What follows is a twisted view of a novel that the author did not, in fact, write. Charney’s Distantly Related to Freud is a wise chronical of a child encountering the entire range of life’s deceptions that often dash hopes but build character. It was a pleasure to accompany her on her journey in what is an extraordinarily well written and very substantial book.

Reply

9 Merrily Weisbord 03.02.2009 at 4:45 pm

I read Distantly Related to Freud and did not distantly relate to it as a holocaust book. The main character’s journey toward becoming a writer and becoming her own person were the operative narrative. Ellen´s hilarious first sex somewhat echoed my own, but her life after immigrating to 50’s Montreal was a revelation of formative experiences and perceptions.
For me, the beauty of the novel is that it provokes thoughts and questions about profound themes — native/immigrant gestalt, the past in the present, family ties/binds – which made me consider not only how Ellen, the main character developed, but about how I developed too.

Reply

10 Kate Orland Bere 03.02.2009 at 10:55 pm

I agree with Elaine Kalman above, on the art of reviewing, although if a competent reviewer has done an honest, thoughtful, & thorough job, this can also be a great asset to a writer as well as to any reader. If a review is merely a trashing of the work, it probably is not a thorough, or a fair, review. Which is why it probably is not fair here, perhaps, to cobble four “mini-reviews” into a 500 word piece, simply because they all (sort-of) seem to have a common theme. An author and their book deserves a full 500 words, if chosen for review.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: